History

1. Statement of Intent
2. Street Performance

3. General Considerations
4. Policy Standards
 4.1. Enforcement
 4.2. The Permit
 4.3. Hours
 4.4. Length of Performance
 4.5. Locations
 4.6. Distance Requirements
 4.7. Animals
 4.8. Dangerous Objects
 4.9. Equipment Mobility
 4.10. Amplification Sources
 4.11. Sound Levels
 4.11.4 The use of a Monitor
 4.11.8 Sound Meter
 4.12. Tapes and CDs
 4.13. Special Events

4.5. Locations

Policy

  • location restrictions, if necessary, should be time sensitive

  • location restrictions can cause excess demand for prime performance space

  • not all acts effect pedestrial flow in the same way as an option to location restrictions, the City and Performers should work together to improve the Performers' crowd control skills.

  • if a performer's audience is causing conflicts enforcement may move the audience

  • care should be taken to examine what areas are important to Performers

 

4.5.1. Certain areas attract heavy public and Performer usage, but not at all times. During several hours of several days per week during the peak tourist seasons Performers may create congestion (and the slim possibility of a safety hazard). However, placing a blanket restriction on an area at all times deprives Performers of great performance locations during the off peak hours and seasons.

4.5.3. If there is any consideration of location restrictions, they should be time sensitive restrictions.

4.5.4. There is great concern that the limiting of good performance locations will force Performers to compete for the remaining few areas. This will cause long waits, and the better Performers, with other venue options, will be the first to leave.

4.5.5. Many Performers do not attract the kinds of crowds which impede pedestrial flow. It is unfair to restrict access to a location to all Performers because a few Performers have large audiences or may be irresponsible with regards to controlling them.

4.5.6. An option might be for the City and Performers to work together to develop an understanding of what is needed to assist performers in gaining improved crowd control skills. As a result the City would develop a Performer population with a better understanding of crowd control and an ability to comply and assist in all locations.

4.5.7. Information sheets describing these understandings and techniques could be developed with, and distributed to, the Performers by Enforcement personnel or by SMSPG. If a Performer was having difficulty they could be assisted by Enforcement.

4.5.8. If an audience is judged by Enforcement to be creating a difficulty the Officer could approach the Performer for assistance in controlling the crowd. If the Performer is unable to resolve the situation, Enforcement could then take action to move the part of the crowd which is causing difficulty.

4.5.9. Special concern should be taken to examine whether a location under consideration for restriction is a vital location for performers. What might look good on paper could dramatically hurt the viability of many Performers. For example the location near Teasers on Third Street is important to many of the better acts. If the current restrictions regarding this area were regularly enforced, several world class acts would be discourage from performing on the Promenade and go elsewhere.

NEXT









© Ned Landin 1998 all rights reserved